Portfolio Performance for May 2008

I've been neck deep in one heck of a massive project at work. Today is the first day in months that I've got a breath. And with that breath, I figure I'd post the portfolio's performance from the past few months.



As you can see, the past two months have been the best months of the year for the portfolio. Still not great...but much better than before. In fact, in the chart below, you can see the portfolio's monthly return finally beat the market for the first time this year.



You might have noticed a change in the charts from the prior month's reporting. That's due to a change in Icarra's chart rendering methodology. This new methodology proved more difficult to post images to this blog. So, I rolled my own portfolio software. Which is definitely a work in progress. Over time, I hope to develop the capabilities to track and share more details on trade statistics from this software.

My ultimate goal is to merge my backtesting application with this portfolio software. This way I could compare simulated results with real-time performance.

What are my next investment experiments?

• I'm curious how the elements of permaculture can be used in selecting investment vehicles for the portfolio.
• Would Janet Brown's investment methodology improve my system results?
• When receiving a large number of buys for a given sector...is it better to buy as many stocks as I can under my risk limits? Or more appropriate to opt-out of all the individual stocks and buy an ETF in that sector to capture the obvious sector-based trend?
• Measuring systems that utilize different levels of cash throughout their system life cycle. If system A's performance is better at all conventional levels (Sharpe, ROI, etc.) than system B's...yet system B uses 50% less cash...are the comparisons valid? I don't believe so...but how do you compare then? Via converting unused cash to utilize market-based returns? This is a tough one.

That's it from here where we've had so much rain in Missouri that I'm beginning to think I'm back in East Texas.

Later Trades,

MT

Portfolio Performance for Feb 2008

Another month in drawdown. This is where the lesser experienced would begin to question the validity of their system. Has something stopped working? Did the market change? If you design your strategy based on a helter skelter of methodologies...you may have a point.



But, if you build your system based on capturing the market's inherent behavior: stocks can exceed 100% returns but never exceed 100% loss (unless on margin). Then you know when the market turns south...you'll turn south. Nothing you can do but weather the storm. The fortunate thing is you have allocated your money based on this knowledge...that there will be storms. And you must wait for the storm to pass...the skies to clear...and the markets to return.

Below are the sector breakdowns for the portfolio. The cash level increased 35% from last month's level. Again, the increase in cash will reduce the portfolio's drawdown should the market continue to stall. But, decrease our returns should the market recover.



In fact, you can see in the chart below the difference the cash level is making to the portfolio.



February's drawdown is beginning to slowdown in comparison to the benchmark. As we move further and further into the market's downturn...the portfolio will begin to break off from the benchmark due to the rising cash level.

This rising cash level is due to 29% of the portfolio's positions hitting trailing stops since Jan 1st. In that same timeframe, our new new positions increased by 4%. Is this good or bad? Neither. Just the way the market works.

On a side note...the weather here in Missouri is toying with us. You can tell spring is trying to push it's way in...but the winter isn't giving up without a fight. Crazy thing to be riding bikes in short-sleeves one day and bracing for snow the next. Markets and weather...what fun.

Later Trades,

MT

Portfolio Performance for Jan 2008

I would like to have done a better job at my first portfolio performance post. But, I'm afraid I've been extremely busy at my day job. So, please be patient. My hope for future performance posts is to include much more information about the returns and portfolio breakdown.



One of the difficult items I've found in preparing for posting of portfolio performance is the lack of good tools. I've tried quite a few products the past few months and was about to give up hope until I found Icarra. Sweet product. One of the hardest things to create is a simple product. So many developers miss the mark...the tendency is to focus on the bells and whistles. Icarra hits the mark with it's great charts, sector breakdowns, and ease of trade entry.

This is a good segway into developing a portfolio. As an investor, you have unlimited choices. Question to ask yourself...do you focus on the bells and whistles? Or do you hunker down and keep your choices simple...your strategy simple. If you find yourself changing your portfolio on every market downturn just because you feel like you should be doing something...then maybe it's time to refocus. Are you really improving your portfolio returns? Or just keeping yourself busy?

Now, back to portfolio performance. There are some things to note. I have not entered my actual entry prices into Icarra. Just too much data to sift thru in order to accomplish that. Instead, I have entered all the positions as if I bought them on the last day of 2007 (12/31/2007). From this point forward I will enter all sells, new buys, dividends, interest, etc. into Icarra. But, keep in mind...all performance is based on the clean slate of 2008.

Below is the breakdown of sectors in the portfolio. This is one area that I found some differences in the chart and the actual breakdown in Icarra. But, useful nonetheless. I'll contact Icarra to find the reason for the difference and post in the next performance release.



You can see, I now have a very large cash position in the portfolio. I don't like this, I have to admit. This will cause the portfolio to lag should the market gain back momentum. But, this is the normal process of the system. During market downturns like we've had...the trailing stops are hit and the bugs in the portfolio are killed. Then we have the waiting game for new signals. The goal, of course, is to be 100% invested in the market...that is what generates our returns. But, all seasons have their winters...and this is where we bundle up and wait for the ice to melt.

Another area I want to point out in the sector breakdown is the lack of consistency in the sector weightings. My goal is to have a better balance in the sector weightings. These sector weightings cannot always be controlled due to the nature of the system's signals. Some sectors may be very cold and other sectors can be very hot. Based on the weightings above, the services sector was pretty hot for 2007....and have held up relatively well in the portfolio during our bug killing in the recent market downturn.

Finally, I want to review the monthly returns of the portfolio...



Pretty large differential between the portfolio's monthly returns and the S&P 500's. The system is more volatile than the market and as result drawdowns and gains are larger. This is par for the course with trend following systems in general. It takes a lot of patience to trade a trend following system. Especially, a long-term trend following system. But, I truly believe, that's where the returns are in the long-term.

Can this be improved? Possibly. There are ideas I have yet to test that could trim the portfolio's volatility. And hopefully, I'll get a chance to test these ideas in the months to come.

If you have any questions or would like to see other aspects of the portfolio...drop me a line.

Later trades,

MT

This post is for information and entertainment purposes only. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities or any other type of investment instruments.

Quote of the Week - 01/16/2008

The last spike of the transcontinental Railroad is driven at Promontory, Utah in 1869.

"Look at a stone cutter hammering away at his rock, perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack showing in it. Yet at the hundred-and-first blow it will split in two, and I know it was not the last blow that did it, but all that had gone before." -- Jacob A. Riis

MT

Quote of the Week - 01/06/2008

"Risk is trying to control something you are powerless over." -- Eric Clapton

Hope your first week of the new year was a good one. I've spent a bit of time planning out the new year (talk about your risk). One of the first items on the agenda is a visit back to Texas to see the family. In addition, some changes will come to the blog.

My testing platform development is coming to an end and I should have more time to research and discuss portfolio ideas/strategies. So, each month I plan to review my personal portfolio composition: returns, drawdowns, sector breakdowns, you get the picture. The first few postings will be a bit raw...but hopefully over time they will improve as will the returns.

Later Trades,

MT

Quote of the Week - 01/01/2008

"I sometimes meet people who say, I'm going to be this and I'm going to be that. You feel kind of bad for them because they're limiting themselves. It's different from having an enthusiasm for something and seeing where life takes you. I feel lucky to never have planned to go into what I did. I always said, "All I want to do is make things, whether it's drawing or writing." If I'd said, "I'm going to be a director," it probably wouldn't have happened." -- Tim Burton

Tim's quote is a great one to start the new year. Focus on what you enjoy and let life handle the details.

Happy New Year!

MT

Quote of the Week - 12/26/2007

"Pick a mountain in life to climb and don't stop til' you reach the top. When you reach the top...be lookin' for the next mountain to climb." -- Life philosophy of Helen Taylor

My Mom died 6 years ago today. I lost track of the times I heard from her, "climb that mountain", when life turned difficult. And the many times I responded, "I'm tired of climbing."

Never would have thought her mountain mantra would have such an impact in my life. That recalling those nagging words would continue to push me forward in life. Even after she's gone.

Still an inspiration, after all these years.

Thanks, Mom.

Mike

Merry Christmas - 2007

The picture above is from December 2006. Our first snow in Missouri. There is a bit of snow on the ground today...but quickly melting. We may have more snow tomorrow.

Hope everyone is having a great Christmas. I've spent my time drinking coffee my daughter gave me and putting together all the presents for the kids. Next step is grilling some nice tenderloins wrapped in bacon. No thoughts about the markets or programming. Just kicking back and enjoying the day.

Oh, and very thankful for the great gift a friend of mine gave me last year. I've never owned a cordless drill before. A friend of mine felt sorry for me and gave me a full set of Dewalt cordless power tools. All these years I've been cussing at putting toys together...until now. Wow, what a difference Dewalt makes. Thanks, buddy!

MT

Quote of the Week - 12/17/2007

"Do what you gotta do so you can do what you want to do"
-- Denzel Washington

MT

To Design or Code?

"The one who does the work decides." -- KDE principle

Jeff Atwood over at the Coding Horror blog discusses a fascinating problem in software development. Doers and talkers. Designers and coders.

I believe all developers need to have a bit of both in their toolbox. Mainly, because the first design is most always changed due to scope creep (failure to see all the pieces to the puzzle). If you spend all your time talking about that first design...you never get to coding. And if you can't get to the coding...you'll fail to find those missing puzzle pieces. And fail to deliver a prototype for the customers to evaluate.

Designers, this means getting your hands dirty in order to create something to improve. Developing systems is an iterative process. Design, code, design, code. And yes, even code, design, code, design. The ultimate goal is to refine the process until you and your customers are satisfied. Whatever it takes. And yes, that means moving to the coding stage even when the optimal design has yet to reveal itself. It's really a Kaizen process. Small accomplished improvements to the initial design pays dividends to all.

Coders, this means before plunging forward hacking away at the problem...ask for feedback of your idea and possible alternatives to the problem. It's important to starting coding down the right path. One that encompasses as much information of the problem as possible. This means you'll need to bring some information to the design table yourself. Perhaps a bit of discovery coding must take place to figure out what elements are involved and possible problems or bottlenecks in your proposed solution. This also helps in keeping the design discussion focused.

So, how does this apply to investing? Well, how many investors/traders do you know that invest without a plan? Without a design? An overriding investment philosophy? Just plunge ahead into the market?

These type of investors would be well served by stepping back a bit and design their investment model. Then ask for feedback of their proposed design. It's okay to perform some discovery trading first. Determining how the market handles your ideas. But, gather what you need and then design. Then invest with the goal of continually refining your design.

What about investors/traders who are afraid of the market? Have not found an investment model that is perfect? And refuse to step a toe in the market waters until they feel 100% comfortable in their design? Problem with this thinking is knowledge requires experience. And nothing is ever 100%...especially in the market. So, create your investment manifesto and then try it out. You can't improve upon something that isn't there to improve. And you can't design a successful investment strategy if you don't have market experience.

Later trades,

MT

Breakthrough Programming

“The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” -- George Bernard Shaw

Scott over at the scottberkun.com blog links to an amazing paper on Managing for Breakthroughs in Productivity. The article discusses how breakthroughs occur...and don't occur. My favorite quote...

For breakthroughs to occur, people must be given a chance to do work than can not be proven: ambition and risk are necessary for breakthroughs. If individuals are not trusted to take risks, breakthroughs are unlikely.

Spot on! Programming and risk goes hand in hand. As do programming and ambition.

To be an effective programmer you must have the ambition to automate tasks...all tasks. That's your job. If you spend your time manually putting widgets together...then you're not really programming.

And in order to automate tasks...a programmer has to take risks. Cause you are programming something that has never been done by a computer before. At least that computer. And most likely, never been programmed by you before.

MT

Programming Culture

Hat tip to Howard Lindzon for sharing this post...Software Engineering Tips for Startups

Alex's tips for startups is one of the best posts I've read in a long time on building a programming culture. I realize the focus is on tech startups. But, I believe his points are applicable to all companies with programming departments.

Some of my favorite quotes...

So the first tip is to always have a strong technical co-founder. Someone who shares or invents the business along with others, but also has the technical feet on the ground. Someone who can make sure the business is mapped onto technology correctly.

Avoid hiring managers...What you need are experienced technical people who love coding. These are going to be natural mentors for your younger engineers. Mentors and not managers.

Coding becomes sculpting. Starting with a shapeless form you continuously refine the code to satisfy the business requirements and make sure that the system is designed and implemented correctly.

And probably my favorite in regard to hiring programmers...

...candidates need to demonstrate love for simple and elegant code.

Simple and elegant code = Simple and elegant company.

I would also like to add one more trait to look for in programmers. Willingness to share knowledge. Evidence of this sharing trait in the interview and in past performance.

For example, all programmers develop tools to make their jobs easier. But, do they develop those tools for themselves only? Or for others to use as well? We all know...developing anything for others to use is the harder path to follow. But, without knowledge transfer, the wheel will be re-invented...again, again, and again.

Have a great weekend,

MT

Quote of the Week - 11/28/2007

"The Things to do are: the things that need doing, that you see need to be done, and that no one else seems to see need to be done. Then you will conceive your own way of doing that which needs to be done — that no one else has told you to do or how to do it. This will bring out the real you that often gets buried inside a character that has acquired a superficial array of behaviors induced or imposed by others on the individual." -- Bucky Fuller

Great quote. What do you see that needs to be done? And more importantly...what are you doing about it? But, a precaution...doing what needs to be done that hasn't been done by others prompts others to stall/halt the doing. Do you have what it takes to overcome the others in order to get the doing done?

MT

Quote of the Week - 11/10/2007

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction." -- Albert Einstein

Something to think about when developing systems.

MT

Backtesting Issues

I'm in the process of validating some investment ideas and thought I'd share some of the hidden biases that occur when comparing systems against each other and the market in general. I should know...these issues have bit me numerous times over my past 7 years of system testing. Maybe the testing methods below will help you as they have helped me.

Failure to Trade All Signals

• Every signal received from your idea should be tested. Which means taking trades for a stock you already own. If your idea is to buy 20-day highs and you receive your first signal for YHOO on 10/15/2007...you buy it. If you receive another signal on 10/16/2007 for YHOO...guess what? You buy it. Despite already owning the stock. Failure to do so means your filtering the idea. This is okay if you already know the idea is valid...but if so...then why are you testing in the first place?

• A big obstacle in taking all signals is money. First test the idea without money constraints. Money should not limit your trades. In fact, when testing...the only limit on your trades should be the idea.

Failure to Test the Other Side

• The Trading Digest covers idea reversals in their article on the 50/200 Moving Avererage Crossover system. In essence, any idea should be reversed, tested, and compared with the original idea.

• So, if the idea is selecting 20-day highs...the reverse of that idea is selecting stocks less than or equal to their 20-day highs. But, performing this test presents a problem. There are fewer stocks at their 20-day highs (idea #1) than stocks not at their 20-day highs (idea #2).

• It's unfair to compare 150 trades from idea #1 against 5,000 trades from idea #2. Whose to say randomly selecting 150 trades from the 5,000 trades in the idea #2 sample set wouldn't generate as good if not better results than idea #1?

• And that's just how to solve the problem...boot-strap it. Take those 5,000 trades and randomly select 150 trades. Compare those results against idea #1's sample set of 150. Of course, it wouldn't be wise to select one 150-set sample from 5,000. Take several 150-set samples...compile the results and use that for the comparison.

Remove the Best Trades

• With any system...the Pareto Principle is large and in charge. You'll find only 5% to 10% of the trades generate the majority of the idea's profits. What are the chances you would have missed a few of those trades? Throw money limits into the mix and real world events like vacations and that home remodeling project your wife has been bugging you about...and it's very easy to do. So, remove them from the test sample. Don't let a few trades in the sample play such a large role in the results.

Market Exposure

• When buying presents for your kids...the number one rule is every kid must receive the same number of presents. If you fail here...you will pay. Testing and comparing ideas are a lot like your kids. Give them equal time and exposure.

• Use the same signal starting point for the comparisons. If your testing date range is 01/01/1995 - 12/31/2004 and idea #1 kicks off it's first signal on 05/01/1995 and idea #2 kicks off it's first signal on 02/01/1996...no fair! Idea #1 received a 9 months head start on idea #2. Might not seem like much...but with markets and babies...9 months can make a difference.

• In fact, it usually pays to bucket the trades in similar timeframes. That way you can ensure not only the trades share similar signal start times but also similar bucket sizes. For example, to test 10 years of data...01/01/1995 - 12/31/2004:

Bucket 1 -> 01/01/1995 - 12/31/1996
Bucket 2 -> 01/01/1997 - 12/31/1998
Bucket 3 -> 01/01/1999 - 12/31/2000
Bucket 4 -> 01/01/2001 - 12/31/2002
Bucket 5 -> 01/01/2003 - 12/31/2004

• The buckets 1 - 5 above would be the testing date ranges. After the simulations are complete for each idea and corresponding bucket...verify idea #1's bucket 1 contains roughly the same number of trades as idea #2's bucket 1. If not, then boot-strap the larger bucket size down to the smaller bucket's size. Compare results. And remember, remove the top 5% or so trades from each idea's buckets.

[Clarification: The testing date ranges in the buckets listed above are not the start and end dates for your trades. The date ranges are the start and end dates for your idea. Meaning...all ideas triggered from 01/01/1999 to 12/31/2000 would be in Bucket 3. You would need to track those signals for as long as you stay in them...which may mean all the way to your end date of 12/31/2004. Make sense?

In essence, your overall begin and end dates are 01/01/1995 - 12/31/2004. Then you slice and dice the signals that occurred during that time frame based on entry date into buckets 1 - 5.]

Questions?

• What if the idea consists of several smaller ideas such as selecting stocks at their 20-day high and on that new high experience a 30-day volume surge? In this case, you would need to iterate through the above process twice.

• In the first pass, you'd compare the 20-day high stocks against stocks not at their 20-day high. In the second pass (if the first pass proves fruitful), compare the 20-day high stocks with 30-day volume surges against 20-day high stocks without 30-day volume surges.

As you can see, getting an idea through the validation process is quite an ordeal. Unfortunately for us system traders; very few ideas make it out alive. Thankfully, we don't have to cut those ideas from our sample set.

Later Trades,

MT

Quote of the Week - 10/10/2007

"...the most important quality for a trader to develop is discipline. As you've read, my stubborn ego and impatience prevented me from achieving lasting success and financial security. I hope my story has shown you that any fool can get lucky and quickly make a great deal of money. But, if playing the stock market was always that easy, there would be no need for research and hard work. Considering that all the information you need to be able to profit is available on the Internet, what sets successful traders apart is their ability to wade through all the muck. With regard to your sources, keep an open mind. As my losses demonstrate, if you allow your emotions and ego to control your trading, you are doomed to fail." -- Timothy Sykes from his book, An American Hedge Fund

What great words of advice! Reading Tim's book brought back the memories of what it was like trading in the greatest stock bubble of our time. In fact, I participated in the ISCO trade he mentions in the book. What a ride, indeed!

I look back and realize just how far I've come as a trader and how much further I still have to go. Tim is right...cutting through the muck is a tough chore for any trader/investor. The key to long-lasting success is keeping an open mind, learning from your failures, and working hard...really really hard. Of course, a sprinkle or two of luck never hurts.

Thanks for the book, Tim.

Later Trades,

MT

Recent Links for 09/21/2007

Newbie - converting csv files to arrays in NumPy Great message thread on how to convert csv files to numpy arrays.

Cookbook/InputOutput - Numpy and Scipy File processing examples using numpy, scipy, and matplotlib. How to read/write a numpy array from/to ascii/binary files.

Numpy Example List Examples of Numpy functions such as fromfile(), hsplit(), recarray(), shuffle(), sort(), split(), sqrt(), std(), tofile(), unique(), var(), vsplit(), where(), zeros(), empty(), and many more.

Introducing Plists: An Erlang module for doing list operations in parallel Could you spawn a trading system process for each stock of a given day's trading (a list)? What if you had 20,000 stocks for a given day? Can plists/erlang handle 20,000 processes without hitting memory constraints?

Recent Links for 09/19/2007

130/30 Strategy Backtested Disagree with comparison of 130/30 to non-leveraged benchmark/strategy. Also, the additional longs didn't improve the long portion of the 130/30 returns compared to the long-only strategy returns. Am I missing something?

Recent Links for 09/18/2007

Chapter 22. Struct and Array Modules Overview of the python struct and array modules

Building Skills in Programming Nice python tutorial.

Python Grimoire Nice python cookbook.

Recent Links for 09/17/2007

• One year ago I was a stock market analyst [Part 1]
  Very interesting how he was able to process 9,000 stocks in less than a minute.


• Goldblog - Python - Stock Quote Module
  Interesting python stock quote utility.


• Goldblog - Investment Advice
  Excellent investment advice. Keep it simple.


• NumPy for Numeric/numarray users
  Cheatsheet for NumPy Python users